Property Rights Reforms in China

The New York Times has a story todayon important property rights reforms that are being considered in China. Right now all rural lands are state owned, but under the control of village governments. Individual peasant cultivators could enter into long term leases with their local governments, but they had relatively little in the way of protection for their investments (e.g. the local government could revoke the lease) and little or no ability to lease out or sell the rights to their rental. This appears to be about to change. Lease lengths may be lengthened and it seems households will be able to sub-lease or perhaps even sell their 'rights' to the lease. This is a long (but still cautious) step toward establishing a land market. As the article explains:

Many farmers work on tiny, state-allocated plots of land for a small fraction of the year, investing little in agriculture. While they are entitled to 30-year land-use contracts, the state retains ownership of rural land, and local officials often seize or reallocate it to suit their development priorities.

Development economists say 'institutions' and property rights matter. If so, then these reforms should matter. The concerns, as always is how will these reforms be implemented.

If done right this could give property rights to the rural tillers of the land in ways that create more secure property rights and incentives for investment and wealth accumulation and stimulate rural activity, and lower income inequality.
Officials are eager to stoke new consumer activity at home, and one potentially enormous but barely tapped source of demand is the peasant population, which has been largely excluded from the raging growth in cities.

Average income in rural areas lags far behind the average in cities, giving China one of the starkest income gaps in the world, according to government estimates.

If done wrong, say by giving land to party-connected insiders and developers, peasants who have de facto access to land now, will be in effect expropriated and end up with fewer and less secure property rights. This is already a problem:
Rural land disputes are perhaps the biggest source of social unrest in China. Protests and riots in rural areas number in the thousands each year, according to national police estimates. They are often incited by allegations of corruption and illegal land seizures.
And interesting area of research in economics involves measuring the impacts of land reforms of this sort, and who benefits. It's not as straightforward as you might imagine. Much more on this topic here (by yours truly) and in this will be a class topic.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Help the World’s Poor: Buy Some New Clothes

Help the World’s Poor: Buy Some New Clothes : "Back to school shopping leads many people to buy apparel that was made in sweatshops. Rather than feel guilty for “exploiting” poor workers, shoppers should rejoice. Their spending is some of the best aid we can give to people in poorer countries." So says Benjamin Powell on the always provocative AidWatch blog. Liberal New York Times columnist and Economics Nobel Prize international economist Paul Krugman wrote an earlier and now often cited statement along similar lines titled " In Praise of Cheap Labor: Bad jobs at bad wages are better than no jobs at all ." Do you agree with these arguments?
Read more

Tariffs on Ethanol

New York Times columnist Tom Friedman writes about US tariffs on Brazilian sugar ethanol and calls them "dumb": Thanks to pressure from Midwest farmers and agribusinesses, who want to protect the U.S. corn ethanol industry from competition from Brazilian sugar ethanol, we have imposed a stiff tariff to keep it out. We do this even though Brazilian sugar ethanol provides eight times the energy of the fossil fuel used to make it, while American corn ethanol provides only 1.3 times the energy of the fossil fuel used to make it. We do this even though sugar ethanol reduces greenhouses gases more than corn ethanol. And we do this even though sugar cane ethanol can easily be grown in poor tropical countries in Africa or the Caribbean, and could actually help alleviate their poverty. Yes, you read all this right. We tax imported sugar ethanol, which could finance our poor friends, but we don’t tax imported crude oil, which definitely finances our rich enemies. We’d rather power ant
Read more

US Car giants lobby the White House (and pawn the shop)

From the BBC Mr Bush met bosses from DaimlerChrysler Ford and GM, all struggling against Asian rivals, to discuss concerns over growing imports and health costs. The companies, which spend more on health costs than on steel, want action to combat the weak Japanese yen. The Financial Times adds: Toyota's report last week of record third-quarter profits has fuelled the Detroit carmakers' accusations that Japanese and South Korean exporters are benefiting from currency manipulation by their governments. The three companies' chief economists met senior US Treasury officials recently to underline their concern. UPDATE : George in 740 writes with some further reporting from the Wall Street Journal indicating the nature of the financial crises this firms are beginning to face: GM and Ford, Hungry for Cash, Pledge Assets to Secure Loans By JEFFREY C. MCCRACKEN, JOHN D. STOLL and JOHN D. MCKINNON November 15, 2006; Page A1 Facing a deep financial crisis, Detroit 's two top auto
Read more